Insecure browser/WebGL disabled: There are security and user experience issues with your current browser. A secure modern browser with WebGL enabled is required to display interactive maps and other features.
Melbourne Airport

Virtual Visitor CentreMaster Plan 2022 and Third Runway

  • Virtual Visitor Centre
  • M3R Flight Path and Noise Tool
  • Glossary
FAQ
Translated documents

Next – Noise and vibration

Back to categories

Noise and vibration

Map layers

2026

2036

Noise monitoring

Background noise monitoring was undertaken in December 2020 and used to calculate Noise Management Levels for the construction phase of the proposal in accordance with the methodology in the Interim Construction Noise Guideline (Department of Environment and Climate Change, 2009).

Construction noise

Noise modelling of the indicative construction activities and stages indicates there would be exceedances of the Noise Management Levels during construction works, due to the small offset distance between the proposal and sensitive receivers.

During construction, a small number of receivers would be highly affected with noise levels potentially exceeding 75 dBA at some point during the works.

The noisiest stage is predicted to be vegetation clearing due to the operation of equipment like chainsaws, but which would last only two weeks.

Out of hours works, which may include evening or night-time works, would be required for certain activities such as pedestrian bridge works and road works and may also result in exceedances of Noise Management Levels.

With respect to additional traffic movements, the increase in noise from construction traffic is predicted to be less than 0.1 dB, and the additional movements would have a negligible impact on the local noise environment.

Minimum safe working distances have been included in the REF to minimise vibration impacts to human comfort and buildings (including heritage items).

Operational noise

Operational noise has been assessed in accordance with the Road Noise Policy (Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, 2011) and the former Road and Maritime’s Noise Criteria Guideline.

High existing noise levels were identified throughout the proposal area which would continue in the future, with or without proposal.

A total of 13 receivers have been identified in the noise modelling as exceeding applicable design noise criteria and are eligible for consideration of additional noise mitigation, such as architectural treatment, which would be undertaken during detailed design.

REF Chapter 6.6 - Noise and vibration

Next – Traffic and transport

Back to categories

Traffic and transport

Operational impacts

Overall, the proposal would improve the existing performance of the highway including accommodating future increases to traffic volumes in 2036. Alterations to the existing alignment, particularly the signalised control system and U-turn bay at Bellevue Crescent and the addition of right turn bays eastbound into key amenities would improve the safety of vehicles and the community.

Other positive impacts of the proposal include:

  • improved traffic flows which would benefit local and regional traffic. In particular, the upgraded highway would be able to support longer, heavier vehicles that are able to transport more freight per vehicle

  • improved safety for vehicles with upgraded intersections at Bellevue Crescent and the Hydro Majestic Hotel with new turning lanes, U-turn bay, signalisation, lane markings and signage

  • minimising potential for pedestrian/vehicle conflicts through the installation of a new pedestrian bridge, stairs and lifts that would provide an accessible path of travel across the highway and to public transport facilities

  • enhanced public transport facilities including new kiss and ride and indented bus bays which would provide a safe location for customers to transfer between modes

  • a new shared path for pedestrians and cyclists which would also help to improve safety, as well as promote better health and encourage tourism by enhancing connections to existing trails

  • additional commuter parking at Railway Parade, including accessible parking.

Construction impacts

During construction, traffic and transport impacts and risks include:

  • potential increases in vehicle movements and changes to traffic flows which may lead to short traffic delays, for example:

    ● A temporary road closure of one hour would be required to allow for the operation of a crane to lift in and install the new pedestrian bridge

    ● Other temporary partial road or lane closures would be required at times to allow for road works (such as new pavement, kerb and gutter works) however it is proposed that alternating one-way traffic flow would be able to be maintained

  • changes for pedestrians and cyclists accessing the station and surrounding footpath/road network which could mean detours and longer walking/cycling distances

  • delays to buses on the Great Western Highway and temporary reduction in accessibility to bus stops as some bus stops would need to be relocated particularly where work activities being undertaken within the highway corridor.

The number of truck movements to the work sites during construction is unknown at this stage, however based on similar projects is likely to be less than 200 per day. Trucks movements would be distributed throughout the day equating to less than 30 movements per hour based on an eight-hour workday. This additional traffic is unlikely to have a significant impact on the road network. Similarly, there is expected to be an increase in light vehicle movements but the traffic assessment concluded that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional traffic.

There are a number of properties with direct access to the road network within the proposal area. Access to affected properties would be maintained throughout. Temporary property access would be provided where required.

REF Chapter 6.5 - Traffic and transport

Next – Biodiversity

Back to categories

Biodiversity

The concept design for the proposal has utilised, where possible, disturbed areas in preference to native vegetation but would result in the clearing of about 0.36 hectares of vegetation. This includes 0.34 hectares of vegetation identified as plant community type (PCT 1248) Sydney Peppermint – Silvertop Ash which was observed to be of moderate and poor condition. No Threatened Ecological Communities would be directly impacted by the proposal.

The loss of vegetation would have a minor impact on the habitat of highly mobile threatened fauna species in the local including foraging habitat for species capable of utilizing roadside margins such as the Gang Gang Cockatoo, Little Lorikeet, Scarlet Robin and Varied Sittella.

An assessment of significance was prepared in accordance with the BC Act and EPBC Act for identified impacts on potentially affected threatened species and ecological communities. The assessment concluded that the proposal is not likely to have a significant impact to threatened biodiversity.

As there will be residual impacts to biodiversity, mitigation measures guided by The Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting and managing biodiversity of RTA projects (NSW Roads and Traffic Authority, 2011a) would be implemented during construction and operation to further reduce the potential ecological impacts of the proposal. No biodiversity offsets are required for the proposal.

REF Chapter 6.1 - Biodiversity

Next – Water quality

Back to categories

Water quality

Hydrology and flooding

Construction activities would involve earthworks and other ground disturbing activities that would increase the risk of sedimentation either through vehicle movements, or wind/water runoff. Such earthworks may also increase the risk of blockages to waterways and drainage lines resulting in localised flooding or scour impacts. These impacts are expected to be minor and would be managed through the implementation of standard sedimentation and drainage measures.

The proposal includes changes in the road geometry and widening which would create an increase in the paved area. This can change existing flood behaviour and alter the flood risk to receivers during operation. Based on hydrological modelling, upstream impacts are generally considered minor given there would be limited vertical changes, and the flows could largely be accommodated by the existing and upgraded drainage structures to be provided. Downstream flooding impacts would be managed through the installation of new detention basins and drainage upgrades.

Scour potential would be increased with higher velocities and larger flow rates than experienced under existing conditions. Appropriate scour protection to ensure suitable velocity and peak flow protection would be undertaken during detailed design.

Surface water and groundwater

In addition to sedimentation and scour impacts which can contribute to poor water quality there is also a risk of releasing potentially harmful chemicals and other substances in the environment due to spills both during construction and operation. Groundwater impacts during construction and operation include risks to groundwater quality as a result of spills or poor management of groundwater encountered during earthworks.

While the proposal would increase the pavement area and introduce new drainage discharge structures which can contribute to water quality risks, a number of mitigation measures have been included as part of the concept design including level spreaders to limit scour potential at discharge locations and detention basins with integrated bioretention to provide stormwater filtration and treatment before releasing flows to the environment.

The Neutral or Beneficial Effect (NorBE) assessment carried out for the proposal (which is a requirement as the proposal is located within the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment) found that assuming the mitigation recommendations are adopted, the proposal would achieve a beneficial outcome with regard to surface water quality. Impacts to groundwater were considered to be negligible.

In addition to sedimentation and scour impacts which can contribute to poor water quality there is also a risk of releasing potentially harmful chemicals and other substances in the environment due to spills both during construction and operation. Groundwater impacts during construction and operation include risks to groundwater quality as a result of spills or poor management of groundwater encountered during earthworks.

While the proposal would increase the pavement area and introduce new drainage discharge structures which can contribute to water quality risks, a number of mitigation measures have been included as part of the concept design including level spreaders to limit scour potential at discharge locations and detention basins with integrated bioretention to provide stormwater filtration and treatment before releasing flows to the environment.

The Neutral or Beneficial Effect (NorBE) assessment carried out for the proposal (which is a requirement as the proposal is located within the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment) found that assuming the mitigation recommendations are adopted, the proposal would achieve a beneficial outcome with regard to surface water quality. Impacts to groundwater were considered to be negligible.

REF Chapter 6.2 - Hydrology and flooding REF Chapter 6.3 - Surface water and groundwater

Next – Landscape and urban design

Back to categories

Landscape character and visual impacts

Landscape character

The village of Medlow Bath is located between Blackheath to the north, and Katoomba to the south, and mostly consists of single story dwellings, guest-houses and retreats. The western edge of the Great Western Highway is physically and visually dominated by the locally heritage listed Hydro Majestic Hotel, which is positioned atop the Megalong Valley escarpment. The escarpment is locally protected due to its high scenic values. To the east of the Great Western Highway, vegetation creates a buffer between Medlow Bath residential tree-lined streets and the existing highway and rail corridor. Further east, low density housing backs onto the national park.

Visual impacts

Visual impacts have been mitigated in the proposal by:

  • locating new infrastructure as much as possible within or near to the existing road corridor
  • refinement of the design to compliment the existing setting and make new elements less dominant whilst maintaining key views
  • addition of vegetation to further establish the village character of Medlow Bath, assist in integrating the proposal within the landscape setting and minimise impacts on views.

Artist impressions (as before/after images on the map) show what the proposal may look like once complete were prepared for seven key viewpoints and were used to inform the visual impact assessment which considers the magnitude of a change, and the sensitivity of receiver location to then assign an overall impact level. From this assessment it was identified the proposal would result in the following overall visual impacts, mainly as a result of the introduction of a new pedestrian bridge:

  • High visual impact at one viewpoint looking east toward the alternative Bellevue Crescent option.
  • High-moderate visual impact three viewpoints
    • at northern corner of Bellevue Crescent and Great Western Highway looking north
    • at Station Street looking south
    • at Railway Parade looking south
  • Moderate visual impact at two viewpoints
    • along the existing shared user path, adjacent to the Great Western Highway and Hydro Majestic Hotel, looking north
    • on Medlow Bath Station platform looking north towards the new pedestrian bridge
  • Moderate-Low visual impact at one viewpoint:
    • Along the existing shared user path, adjacent to Blue Mountains Mazda, looking south.
REF Chapter 6.9 - Landscape character and visual impacts

Next – Heritage

Back to categories

Heritage

Aboriginal cultural heritage

Construction would include excavation and other ground disturbing activities which can potentially impact Aboriginal archaeology, if present. There are no known Aboriginal sites identified within the proposal area. In addition, the proposal area has undergone extensive landscape modification and high level of disturbance from previous transport development which has been documented as part of previous Aboriginal heritage investigations (Jacobs, 2020). Therefore, there is a low likelihood that the proposal would impact any previously unidentified culturally sensitive items.

Non-Aboriginal heritage

There are a number of listed heritage items located within the proposal area, adjacent to or in the vicinity of the proposal, along with a number of potential heritage items that were identified during site inspections. Impacts to heritage items can be direct (eg physical impacts to heritage fabric such as their partial or complete removal) or indirect (such as affecting views or vistas of heritage value). There are also risks to subsurface archaeology where historical evidence of past land use may be adversely impacted by ground disturbing works.

A summary of the impacts to those items potentially directly impacted by the proposal is included in the table below. This includes works within the curtilage of the State heritage listed Medlow Bath Railway Station and a Section 60 application under the NSW Heritage Act 1977 would be submitted seeking approval for the proposal from the Heritage Council of NSW.

Impacts to other listed or potential heritage items adjacent to or in the vicinity of the proposal have also been assessed and include generally minor to major visual impacts. The proposal area has been assessed to be of low archaeological potential. Potential impacts due to excavation is considered to be unlikely. However, the proposal may have a moderate to major adverse impact on the archaeological potential of the proposal area, if archaeological resources survive.

REF Chapter 6.7 - Aboriginal cultural heritage REF Chapter 6.8 - Non-Aboriginal heritage

Back to categories

Back to map
-->
Map key
  • APAM Boundary

  • Existing Terminal


  • Concept Plan Ultimate

  • Runways

  • Runway starter extension

  • Taxiways

  • Apron and Terminals

  • Freight

  • Aviation Support and Maintenance

  • Future Aviation Development

  • Melbourne Business Park

  • Melbourne Airport City

  • Recreation, Conversation and Water Management

  • Non-Aviation

  • Proposed Melbourne Airport Link (MAL) Road Reservation

  • Sub-precinct

  • Airport Station and Rail Link


  • Alignments to be confirmed

  • Potential Rail

  • Potential Road

Back Reset
Existing Design
  • © 2025 Melbourne Airport
  • Powered by SEE
  • Privacy

Using the interactive map

  1. Put in your address into the search input on the sidebar
  2. Once you've selected your address, customize your search options below
  3. Click 'Get Results'. To restart, simply search another address, or click anywhere the map

Welcome to Melbourne Airport’s Flight Path and Noise Tool

This tool is designed to illustrate projected noise impacts and flight paths associated with the construction of Melbourne Airport’s third runway (M3R), which will run parallel to the existing north-south runway.

The noise tool is designed to provide information about the options being considered for the operation of Melbourne Airport’s third runway.

The tool also illustrates the potential noise impacts associated with a future fourth runway, as envisaged in Melbourne Airport’s Preliminary Draft 2022 Master Plan.

We're updating the Noise Tool

As part of the public exhibition consultation process for the third runway project in 2022, Melbourne Airport launched an interactive flight path and noise tool, which allows people to explore forecast impacts.

On 10 September 2024, the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government approved the draft Major Development Plan (MDP) for Melbourne Airport’s Third Runway. This is pursuant to section 94 of the Airports Act 1996 (Cth).

In line with the approval conditions, Melbourne Airport is now undertaking a two-year process of airspace and flight path design in collaboration with Airservices Australia and Essendon Airport. This process will further refine the airspace and flight paths that were presented in the Major Development Plan and in our online noise tool.

We are working on updates to the online noise tool that will help with the community consultation process during the next two years. You can register your details here to be kept up to date on the future flight path design. In the meantime, these results will give you an indication of where noise impacts can be expected.

Your feedback about the flight paths and noise will be an important part of the process of finalising our future airspace use.

Please visit our project website Third Runway | Approved airport for further information.

How does this impact me?

To view historic flights and aircraft noise associated with the current two runway operation, please click here

More questions?

Visit our online engagement hub

Previous Next

Why do the flight paths end?

The flight path data collected by The Melbourne Airport Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Glossary

A-Weighted

Referred to as dB(A), convey the loudness of a sound by accounting for the varying sensitivity of the human ear to difference frequencies.

Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP)

A publication containing aeronautical information of a lasting character essential to air navigation. The AIP contains details of regulations, procedures and other information pertinent to the operation of aircraft.

Aircraft noise contours

Contours that display the aircraft noise exposure patterns around an airport. These contours help land-use planning of acceptable development in close proximity to the airport.

Airport Master Plan

The principal planning document required under the Airports Act 1996, setting out a 20-year plan for each leased federal airport.

Airport-lessee company

A Commonwealth-owned airport can only be leased to a company. The company is called an airport- lessee company, which in the case of Melbourne Airport is Australia Pacific Airports Corporation Limited (APAC).

Airservices Australia

Government-owned corporation which provides national air navigation service and aviation rescue fire-fighting services.

Australian Noise Exposure Concept (ANEC)

A map of noise contours based on aircraft operations at an airport in the future. ANEC maps are based on assumptions of future operations. These contours form the basis of an ANEF.

Australian Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF)

A system developed as a land-use planning tool to control encroachment on airports by noise- sensitive buildings. ANEFs are the official forecasts of future noise exposure patterns around an airport and they constitute the contours on which land-use planning authorities base their controls.

Australian Noise Exposure Index (ANEI)

Contours developed under the ANEF framework showing historic noise exposure patterns used in environmental reporting and benchmarking

Buffer Zone

Buffer zones have been included in flight path diagrams within the MDP and Noise Tool to highlight the design stage of the airspace/flight paths. A concept design has been prepared for the MDP and further refinement will occur during the detailed airspace design process should the MDP be approved.

The Flight paths are depicted in the MDP and Noise Tool as a broad band or swathe based around a centreline track it is not possible for aircraft to track precisely along a single line.

Build scenario

The scenario in which the M3R is constructed and operational in accordance with this MDP.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

An independent statutory authority responsible for regulating aviation safety in Australia and the safety of Australian aircraft overseas.

Code C aircraft

An aircraft that has a wingspan of between 24 metres and up to but not including 36 metres. Examples are the Airbus A320 series and Boeing 737 series.

Code E aircraft

An aircraft that has a wingspan of between 52 metres and up to but not including 65 metres. Examples are the Airbus A330 and Boeing 747-400/787

Code F aircraft

An aircraft that has a wingspan of between 65 metres and up to but not including 80 metres. An example is the Airbus A380.

Continuous Climb Operations (CCO)

An aircraft operating technique allowing the execution of a flight profile optimised to the performance of aircraft, leading to significant economy of fuel and environmental benefits in terms of noise and emissions reduction.

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)

An aircraft operating technique in which an arriving aircraft descends from an optimal position with minimum thrust and avoids level flight to the extent permitted by the safe operation of the aircraft and compliance with published procedures and ATC instructions.

Controlled airspace

Airspace of defined dimensions within which air traffic control services are provided in accordance with airspace classifications.

Green Wedge Zone

A State land-use planning zone to control use of the land and to recognise, protect and conserve green wedge land for its agricultural, environmental, historic, landscape, recreational and tourism opportunities, and mineral and stone resources.

Instrument Approach Procedure

A series of predetermined manoeuvres that provide specific protection from obstacles and terrain. An IAP is used for the orderly transfer of an aircraft from the end of the STAR to a landing, or to a point from which a landing may be executed visually.

Instrument flight rules

Procedures to govern flight when the pilot is unable to navigate using visual references under visual flight rules. This involves flying by reference to instruments in the flight deck and navigating by reference to electronic signals.

Instrument landing system

A navigational aid that provides both directional and glide slope guidance for aircraft landing on a runway at an airport.

LAeq

The equivalent continuous sound level is the energy average of the A-weight noise level over a sample period.

LAmax

The maximum A-weighted noise level that is either predicted or recorded over a period.

Major Development Plan

A requirement under the Airports Act 1996 for airport-lessee companies to provide information to the Commonwealth Government and the public about significant planned development on leased federal airport sites.

Melbourne Airport Environs Overlay

A planning control used to limit noise-sensitive uses and the impacts of aircraft noise on development through measures designed to minimise the noise. The areas where these controls apply are determined by an airport’s forecast aircraft noise exposure contours (ANEF).

‘Melbourne Basin’

Refers to the collective airspace around Melbourne including Melbourne Airport, Essendon Fields Airport, Moorabbin Airport, Avalon Airport and RAAF Base Point Cook.

N-above

Contours indicating the number of noise events that exceed a certain level. For example, an N70 contour level shows the number of events above 70 dB(A)

No Build (BAU) scenario

A scenario in which M3R is not constructed, in which Melbourne Airport remains a two-runway airport for the indefinite future.

Noise Abatement Procedure/s (NAPs)

Specify which operating mode will be selected based on the available modes due to meteorological conditions, time of day, demand and a set of mode priorities

Standard Instrument Departure (SID)

A standard route identified in an instrument departure procedure by which aircraft should proceed from take-off phase to the en-route phase of a flight.

Standard Terminal Arrival Route (STAR)

A standard route identified in an approach procedure by which aircraft should proceed from the en-route phase of a flight to an initial approach fix.

Urban Growth Boundary

A planning scheme boundary set to control urban sprawl by mandating that the area inside the boundary be used for higher-density urban development, and the area outside be used for lower- density non-urban development.

Visual Flight Rules

A set of regulations under which a pilot operates an aircraft in weather conditions generally clear enough to allow the pilot to see where the aircraft is going.

Placeholder

Noise Scale dB(A) scale

Noise tool updates

Date Description
May 9th, 2025
  • Added a notice indicating updates to the noise tool
  • Added a disclaimer for the ANEF and ANEC data
April 7th, 2022
  • Added MP22 flight paths
  • Added east-west contours to noise tool to better reflect noise distribution
  • Added helpers on page load to guide user through tool
March 27th, 2022
  • Added disclaimer for addresses potentially receiving increased noise events near airport
  • Improved logic of altitude calculator to cover wider swath of territory
  • Updated wording on map annotations
February 18th, 2022
  • Added altitude calculator to map
February 14th, 2022
  • Added altitude calculator to flight path functionality
January 30th, 2022
  • Flight path and noise tool launched